You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy of Trigger Warnings, Content Warnings, and Content Notes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Psychological Science, August 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1177/21677026231186625 |
| Authors |
Victoria M. E. Bridgland, Payton J. Jones, Benjamin W. Bellet |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,224 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 189 | 15% |
| United Kingdom | 83 | 7% |
| Canada | 61 | 5% |
| Australia | 30 | 2% |
| Spain | 26 | 2% |
| Germany | 24 | 2% |
| France | 17 | 1% |
| Brazil | 12 | <1% |
| South Africa | 10 | <1% |
| Other | 107 | 9% |
| Unknown | 665 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1001 | 82% |
| Scientists | 145 | 12% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 51 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 27 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 40 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 15% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Professor | 4 | 10% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 18% |
| Unknown | 15 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 13 | 33% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
| Linguistics | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 15 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1114. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2024.
All research outputs
#13,760
of 25,804,096 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Psychological Science
#6
of 870 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#373
of 359,891 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Psychological Science
#1
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,804,096 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 870 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 49.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,891 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.