↓ Skip to main content

A Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy of Trigger Warnings, Content Warnings, and Content Notes

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Psychological Science, August 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#6 of 983)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
45 news outlets
blogs
9 blogs
twitter
1102 X users
reddit
199 Redditors
bluesky
22 Bluesky users
podcasts
10 podcasts

Readers on

mendeley
103 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy of Trigger Warnings, Content Warnings, and Content Notes
Published in
Clinical Psychological Science, August 2023
DOI 10.1177/21677026231186625
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,102 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 103 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 11%
Professor 7 7%
Student > Bachelor 6 6%
Other 5 5%
Lecturer 5 5%
Other 16 16%
Unknown 53 51%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 24 23%
Social Sciences 7 7%
Computer Science 4 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 4%
Arts and Humanities 2 2%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 55 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1283. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2026.
All research outputs
#12,882
of 34,518,599 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Psychological Science
#6
of 983 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#342
of 385,609 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Psychological Science
#1
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,518,599 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 983 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 47.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 385,609 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.