↓ Skip to main content

Latex gloves should be powder-free and how to prevent allergic reactions by using an inner polyurethane glove when double gloving

Overview of attention for article published in Nihon Rinsho Geka Gakkai Zasshi (Journal of Japan Surgical Association), January 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Latex gloves should be powder-free and how to prevent allergic reactions by using an inner polyurethane glove when double gloving
Published in
Nihon Rinsho Geka Gakkai Zasshi (Journal of Japan Surgical Association), January 2009
DOI 10.3919/jjsa.70.3512
Authors

Tai-ping HUANG, Masahiro FUJIKAWA, Keigo YASUMASA, Tsuneyuki TANAKA, Masashi HIROTA, Yukihiro NISHIDA

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2017.
All research outputs
#21,048,638
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from Nihon Rinsho Geka Gakkai Zasshi (Journal of Japan Surgical Association)
#142
of 178 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#174,098
of 185,738 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nihon Rinsho Geka Gakkai Zasshi (Journal of Japan Surgical Association)
#15
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 178 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 185,738 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.