You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Global, regional, and national burden of osteoarthritis, 1990–2020 and projections to 2050: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Lancet Rheumatology, August 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s2665-9913(23)00163-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
GBD 2021 Osteoarthritis Collaborators, Jaimie D Steinmetz, Garland T Culbreth, Lydia M Haile, Quinn Rafferty, Justin Lo, Kai Glenn Fukutaki, Jessica A Cruz, Amanda E Smith, Stein Emil Vollset, Peter M Brooks, Marita Cross, Anthony D Woolf, Hailey Hagins, Mohsen Abbasi-Kangevari, Aidin Abedi, Ilana N Ackerman, Hubert Amu, Benny Antony, Jalal Arabloo, Aleksandr Y Aravkin, Ayele Mamo Argaw, Anton A Artamonov, Tahira Ashraf, Amadou Barrow, Lindsay M Bearne, Isabela M Bensenor, Alemshet Yirga Berhie, Nikha Bhardwaj, Pankaj Bhardwaj, Vijayalakshmi S Bhojaraja, Ali Bijani, Paul Svitil Briant, Andrew M Briggs, Nadeem Shafique Butt, Jaykaran Charan, Vijay Kumar Chattu, Flavia M Cicuttini, Kaleb Coberly, Omid Dadras, Xiaochen Dai, Lalit Dandona, Rakhi Dandona, Katie de Luca, Edgar Denova-Gutiérrez, Samath Dhamminda Dharmaratne, Meghnath Dhimal, Mostafa Dianatinasab, Karsten E Dreinhoefer, Muhammed Elhadi, Umar Farooque, Hamid Reza Farpour, Irina Filip, Florian Fischer, Marisa Freitas, Balasankar Ganesan, Belete Negese Belete Gemeda, Tamiru Getachew, Seyyed-Hadi Ghamari, Ahmad Ghashghaee, Tiffany K Gill, Mahaveer Golechha, Davide Golinelli, Bhawna Gupta, Veer Bala Gupta, Vivek Kumar Gupta, Rasool Haddadi, Nima Hafezi-Nejad, Rabih Halwani, Samer Hamidi, Asif Hanif, Netanja I Harlianto, Josep Maria Haro, Jan Hartvigsen, Simon I Hay, Jeffrey J Hebert, Golnaz Heidari, Mohammad-Salar Hosseini, Mehdi Hosseinzadeh, Alexander Kevin Hsiao, Irena M Ilic, Milena D Ilic, Louis Jacob, Ranil Jayawardena, Ravi Prakash Jha, Jost B Jonas, Nitin Joseph, Himal Kandel, Ibraheem M Karaye, Jobair Khan, Yun Jin Kim, Ali-Asghar Kolahi, Oleksii Korzh, Rajasekaran Koteeswaran, Vijay Krishnamoorthy, G Anil Kumar, Narinder Kumar, Sang-woong Lee, Stephen S Lim, Stany W Lobo, Giancarlo Lucchetti, Mohammad-Reza Malekpour, Ahmad Azam Malik, Luiz Garcia Garcia Mandarano-Filho, Santi Martini, Alexios-Fotios A Mentis, Mohamed Kamal Mesregah, Tomislav Mestrovic, Erkin M Mirrakhimov, Awoke Misganaw, Reza Mohammadpourhodki, Ali H Mokdad, Sara Momtazmanesh, Shane Douglas Morrison, Christopher J L Murray, Hasan Nassereldine, Henok Biresaw Netsere, Sandhya Neupane Kandel, Mayowa O Owolabi, Songhomitra Panda-Jonas, Anamika Pandey, Shrikant Pawar, Paolo Pedersini, Jeevan Pereira, Amir Radfar, Mohammad-Mahdi Rashidi, David Laith Rawaf, Salman Rawaf, Reza Rawassizadeh, Seyed-Mansoor Rayegani, Daniela Ribeiro, Leonardo Roever, Basema Saddik, Amirhossein Sahebkar, Sana Salehi, Lidia Sanchez Riera, Francesco Sanmarchi, Milena M Santric-Milicevic, Saeed Shahabi, Masood Ali Shaikh, Elaheh Shaker, Mohammed Shannawaz, Rajendra Sharma, Saurab Sharma, Jeevan K Shetty, Rahman Shiri, Parnian Shobeiri, Diego Augusto Santos Silva, Ambrish Singh, Jasvinder A Singh, Surjit Singh, Søren T Skou, Helen Slater, Mohammad Sadegh Soltani-Zangbar, Antonina V Starodubova, Arash Tehrani-Banihashemi, Sahel Valadan Tahbaz, Pascual R Valdez, Bay Vo, Linh Gia Vu, Yuan-Pang Wang, Seyed Hossein Yahyazadeh Jabbari, Naohiro Yonemoto, Ismaeel Yunusa, Lyn M March, Kanyin Liane Ong, Theo Vos, Jacek A Kopec |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 56 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 13% |
| Spain | 5 | 9% |
| Australia | 3 | 5% |
| Argentina | 3 | 5% |
| Canada | 2 | 4% |
| Belgium | 1 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Denmark | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 29 | 52% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 41 | 73% |
| Scientists | 10 | 18% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 352 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 352 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 29 | 8% |
| Researcher | 26 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 4% |
| Other | 34 | 10% |
| Unknown | 195 | 55% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 48 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 19 | 5% |
| Engineering | 14 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 2% |
| Other | 32 | 9% |
| Unknown | 218 | 62% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2798. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2024.
All research outputs
#2,539
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet Rheumatology
#1
of 898 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57
of 359,233 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet Rheumatology
#1
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 898 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 56.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,233 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.