You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Social Inference Model of Idealization and Devaluation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Psychological Review, April 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1037/rev0000430 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Giles W. Story, Ryan Smith, Michael Moutoussis, Isabel M. Berwian, Tobias Nolte, Edda Bilek, Jenifer Z. Siegel, Raymond J. Dolan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 12 | 32% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 16% |
| Germany | 2 | 5% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 3% |
| Israel | 1 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 12 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 21 | 57% |
| Members of the public | 14 | 38% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 18% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 9% |
| Researcher | 1 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 9% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 5 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 3 | 27% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 9% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 6 | 55% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,117,445
of 25,810,956 outputs
Outputs from Psychological Review
#153
of 1,684 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,924
of 251,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychological Review
#5
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,810,956 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,684 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,052 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.