↓ Skip to main content

Fluid-flow effects in the reactive decontamination of porous materials driven by chemical swelling or contraction

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Engineering Mathematics, August 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fluid-flow effects in the reactive decontamination of porous materials driven by chemical swelling or contraction
Published in
Journal of Engineering Mathematics, August 2023
DOI 10.1007/s10665-023-10283-6
Authors

Y. Geng, A. A. Kamilova, E. K. Luckins

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2023.
All research outputs
#15,958,025
of 24,489,824 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Engineering Mathematics
#73
of 131 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,346
of 323,311 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Engineering Mathematics
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,489,824 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 131 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,311 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them