↓ Skip to main content

Classification, risk stratification and response assessment in myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms (MDS): A state-of-the-art report on behalf of the International Consortium for MDS (icMDS)

Overview of attention for article published in Blood Reviews, August 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#13 of 693)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
53 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Classification, risk stratification and response assessment in myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms (MDS): A state-of-the-art report on behalf of the International Consortium for MDS (icMDS)
Published in
Blood Reviews, August 2023
DOI 10.1016/j.blre.2023.101128
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maximilian Stahl, Jan Philipp Bewersdorf, Zhuoer Xie, Matteo Giovanni Della Porta, Rami Komrokji, Mina L Xu, Omar Abdel-Wahab, Justin Taylor, David P Steensma, Daniel T Starczynowski, Mikkael A Sekeres, Guillermo Sanz, David A Sallman, Gail J Roboz, Uwe Platzbecker, Mrinal M Patnaik, Eric Padron, Olatoyosi Odenike, Stephen D Nimer, Aziz Nazha, Ravi Majeti, Sanam Loghavi, Richard F Little, Alan F List, Tae Kon Kim, Christopher S Hourigan, Robert P Hasserjian, Stephanie Halene, Elizabeth A Griffiths, Steven D Gore, Peter Greenberg, Maria E Figueroa, Pierre Fenaux, Fabio Efficace, Amy E DeZern, Naval G Daver, Jane E Churpek, Hetty E Carraway, Rena Buckstein, Andrew M Brunner, Jacqueline Boultwood, Uma Borate, Rafael Bejar, John M Bennett, Andrew H Wei, Valeria Santini, Michael R Savona, Amer M Zeidan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 53 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Other 1 5%
Lecturer 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 9 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Psychology 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 10 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,009,590
of 25,856,138 outputs
Outputs from Blood Reviews
#13
of 693 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,242
of 361,005 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Blood Reviews
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,856,138 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 693 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,005 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them