↓ Skip to main content

The physical basis of osmosis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of General Physiology, August 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
245 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The physical basis of osmosis
Published in
Journal of General Physiology, August 2023
DOI 10.1085/jgp.202313332
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Osmosis is an important force in all living organisms, yet the molecular basis of osmosis is widely misunderstood as arising from diffusion of water across a membrane separating solutions of differing osmolarities, and hence different water concentrations. In 1923, Peter Debye proposed a physical model for a semipermeable membrane emphasizing the repulsive forces between solute molecules and membrane that prevent the solute from entering the membrane. His work was hardly noticed at the time and slipped out of view. We show that Debye's analysis of van 't Hoff's law for osmotic equilibrium also provides a consistent and plausible mechanism for osmotic flow. A difference in osmolyte concentrations in solutions separated by a semipermeable membrane leads to different pressures at the two water-membrane interfaces because the total repulsive force between solute molecules and the membrane is different at the two interfaces. Water is therefore driven through the membrane for exactly the same reason that pure water flows in response to an imposed hydrostatic pressure difference. In this paper, we present the Debye model in both equilibrium and flow conditions. We point out its applicability regardless of the nature of the membrane with examples ranging from the predominantly convective flow of water through synthetic membranes and capillary walls to the purely diffusive flow of independent water molecules through a lipid bilayer and the flow of a single-file column of water molecules in narrow protein channels.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 245 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 245 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 25 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 2%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 2%
Researcher 5 2%
Professor 4 2%
Other 7 3%
Unknown 193 79%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 25 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 2%
Engineering 5 2%
Physics and Astronomy 4 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 1%
Other 8 3%
Unknown 195 80%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2025.
All research outputs
#4,836,005
of 29,454,253 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Physiology
#319
of 2,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,976
of 372,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Physiology
#8
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,454,253 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,451 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 372,617 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.