↓ Skip to main content

Evidence-based clinical practice guideline for the pharmacologic management of acute dental pain in children A report from the American Dental Association Science and Research Institute, the…

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the American Dental Association (JADA), September 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#31 of 2,591)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
27 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
34 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evidence-based clinical practice guideline for the pharmacologic management of acute dental pain in children A report from the American Dental Association Science and Research Institute, the University of Pittsburgh School of Dental Medicine, and the Center for Integrative Global Oral Health at the University of Pennsylvania
Published in
Journal of the American Dental Association (JADA), September 2023
DOI 10.1016/j.adaj.2023.06.014
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alonso Carrasco-Labra, Deborah E. Polk, Olivia Urquhart, Tara Aghaloo, J. William Claytor, Vineet Dhar, Raymond A. Dionne, Lorena Espinoza, Sharon M. Gordon, Elliot V. Hersh, Alan S. Law, Brian S.-K. Li, Paul J. Schwartz, Katie J. Suda, Michael A. Turturro, Marjorie L. Wright, Tim Dawson, Anna Miroshnychenko, Sarah Pahlke, Lauren Pilcher, Michelle Shirey, Malavika Tampi, Paul A. Moore

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 17%
Student > Master 2 11%
Student > Postgraduate 1 6%
Researcher 1 6%
Unknown 11 61%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 33%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 6%
Unknown 11 61%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 220. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2024.
All research outputs
#179,660
of 25,863,888 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American Dental Association (JADA)
#31
of 2,591 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,458
of 358,848 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American Dental Association (JADA)
#3
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,863,888 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,591 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,848 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.