↓ Skip to main content

Exploring the Interior of Europa with the Europa Clipper

Overview of attention for article published in Space Science Reviews, August 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
37 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Exploring the Interior of Europa with the Europa Clipper
Published in
Space Science Reviews, August 2023
DOI 10.1007/s11214-023-00990-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

James H. Roberts, William B. McKinnon, Catherine M. Elder, Gabriel Tobie, John B. Biersteker, Duncan Young, Ryan S. Park, Gregor Steinbrügge, Francis Nimmo, Samuel M. Howell, Julie C. Castillo-Rogez, Morgan L. Cable, Jacob N. Abrahams, Michael T. Bland, Chase Chivers, Corey J. Cochrane, Andrew J. Dombard, Carolyn Ernst, Antonio Genova, Christopher Gerekos, Christopher Glein, Camilla D. Harris, Hamish C. F. C. Hay, Paul O. Hayne, Matthew Hedman, Hauke Hussmann, Xianzhe Jia, Krishan Khurana, Walter S. Kiefer, Randolph Kirk, Margaret Kivelson, Justin Lawrence, Erin J. Leonard, Jonathan I. Lunine, Erwan Mazarico, Thomas B. McCord, Alfred McEwen, Carol Paty, Lynnae C. Quick, Carol A. Raymond, Kurt D. Retherford, Lorenz Roth, Abigail Rymer, Joachim Saur, Kirk Scanlan, Dustin M. Schroeder, David A. Senske, Wencheng Shao, Krista Soderlund, Elizabeth Spiers, Marshall J. Styczinski, Paolo Tortora, Steven D. Vance, Michaela N. Villarreal, Benjamin P. Weiss, Joseph H. Westlake, Paul Withers, Natalie Wolfenbarger, Bonnie Buratti, Haje Korth, Robert T. Pappalardo

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 20%
Researcher 2 10%
Unspecified 1 5%
Student > Master 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 20%
Engineering 4 20%
Physics and Astronomy 2 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 5%
Unspecified 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,735,917
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from Space Science Reviews
#107
of 1,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,054
of 358,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Space Science Reviews
#1
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,223 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,388 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.