↓ Skip to main content

カンボジア女性工場労働者のための子宮頸がん対策を入口とした女性のヘルスケア向上プロジェクトにおける健康教育活動

Overview of attention for article published in Japanese Journal of Health Education and Promotion, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
96 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
カンボジア女性工場労働者のための子宮頸がん対策を入口とした女性のヘルスケア向上プロジェクトにおける健康教育活動
Published in
Japanese Journal of Health Education and Promotion, May 2019
DOI 10.11260/kenkokyoiku.27.173
Authors

神田 未和, 藤田 則子, 松本 安代, 堀口 逸子, 木村 正

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 96 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 69. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2023.
All research outputs
#639,867
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Health Education and Promotion
#1
of 76 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,667
of 365,431 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Health Education and Promotion
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 76 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,431 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them