You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
AlphaFoldによるタンパク質立体構造予測(実践編)
|
---|---|
Published in |
Seibutsu-kogaku Kaishi, August 2023
|
DOI | 10.34565/seibutsukogaku.101.8_443 |
Authors |
大上 雅史 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 60 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 22 | 37% |
Thailand | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 37 | 62% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 47 | 78% |
Scientists | 13 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2023.
All research outputs
#1,300,286
of 25,891,484 outputs
Outputs from Seibutsu-kogaku Kaishi
#2
of 65 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,961
of 359,542 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Seibutsu-kogaku Kaishi
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,891,484 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 65 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,542 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them