You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
薩摩半島(鹿児島県本土)と徳之島・与論島(奄美群島)から得られた北限更新を含むタツウミヘビの記録
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ichthy, Natural History of Fishes of Japan, August 2023
|
| DOI | 10.34583/ichthy.35.0_28 |
| Authors |
是枝 伶旺, 久木田 直斗, 日比野 友亮, 本村 浩之 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 8 | 22% |
| United States | 2 | 5% |
| China | 1 | 3% |
| Thailand | 1 | 3% |
| Armenia | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 24 | 65% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 36 | 97% |
| Scientists | 1 | 3% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2023.
All research outputs
#1,603,296
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Ichthy, Natural History of Fishes of Japan
#9
of 97 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,802
of 358,776 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ichthy, Natural History of Fishes of Japan
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 97 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,776 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them