↓ Skip to main content

The COVID-19 impact on severe uncontrolled asthma costs and biologic use.

Overview of attention for article published in Allergy and Asthma Proceedings, September 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (57th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The COVID-19 impact on severe uncontrolled asthma costs and biologic use.
Published in
Allergy and Asthma Proceedings, September 2023
DOI 10.2500/aap.2023.44.230045
Pubmed ID
Authors

Najm S Khan, Elizabeth Rubin, Bernard McKenna, Bernard L Palowitch, Frank Sonnenberg, Judith Argon, Reynold A Panettieri

Abstract

Background: Patients with severe uncontrolled asthma (SUA) overwhelmingly contribute to the economic burden of asthma and may require biologic therapy. However, the impact of the CoronaVirus Disease of 2019 (COVID-19) on asthma costs and biologic use has yet to be evaluated. Objective: The objective was to test the hypothesis that SUA costs and biologic use decreased during the pandemic. Methods: We analyzed medical costs and biologic use in patients with SUV from January 2017 to December 2021, by using claims data from a large managed care organization and electronic health record data from Robert Wood Johnson Barnabas Health, according to provider specialty. Results: Of the 3817 managed care organization enrollees within Robert Wood Johnson Barnabas Health with a primary diagnosis of asthma, 348 were identified as having SUA. A nested sample of 151 patients revealed that 50% were managed by primary care physicians (PCP) and specialists, 43% by PCPs only, and 4% by specialists only. The total costs of the claims were $10.8 million over 5 years ($2.2 million per year), with 60% generated from patients seeing PCPs and specialists, 27% from PCPs only, and 15% from specialists only. During the pandemic, total average costs decreased for all care groups (34% PCP-only patients and 45% for both specialist-only and PCP and specialist patients). Inpatient and outpatient costs also decreased and were lowest for patients who saw specialists and highest for patients who saw PCPs and specialists. In contrast, prescription costs increased during the pandemic. Biologic use was steadily increasing until a twofold decrease was observed during the pandemic. Thirteen patients were on biologics: two were managed by PCPs, four by specialists, and seven by both. Conclusion: Inpatient and outpatient costs decreased during the COVID-19 pandemic, but prescription costs increased. Biologic use was increasing among patients with SUA before the pandemic but then drastically decreased and remained lower during the observational interval.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 50%
Student > Master 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 50%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2023.
All research outputs
#15,106,857
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Allergy and Asthma Proceedings
#551
of 990 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#149,752
of 353,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Allergy and Asthma Proceedings
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 990 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,101 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.