↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
5 patents

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Increased apoptosis and reduced replication efficiency of the E3 region-modified dl309 adenovirus in cancer cells
Published in
Virus Research, July 2009
DOI 10.1016/j.virusres.2009.06.016
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The Adenovirus (Ad) dl309 mutant, which lacks several E3 region genes, has been used as the backbone for a number of replication selective cytopathic Ads designed to treat tumours. We report that dl309 has enhanced cytopathogenicity in a range of different cell lines when compared with Ad5. The E3 region modifications found in dl309 contributed to reduced late gene expression in both cocksackie-adenovirus receptor (CAR) positive and negative cells. We show that completion of the dl309 viral lifecycle was less efficient and apoptosis was triggered in the CAR negative K1 thyroid cancer-derived cell line. There was increased E1A expression in dl309-infected K1 cells, compared with Ad5, and significantly, whereas E1A in Ad5-infected cells was distributed both in the nuclear and cytoplasmic compartments, E1A was predominantly nuclear in dl309-infected K1 cells. From these results we conclude that the regions of dl309 that are deleted or otherwise modified can contribute to viral replication and inhibition of apoptosis, possibly indirectly by regulating E1A. These data have implications in the development of dl309-based Ads for the treatment of tumours in vivo.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Sweden 1 6%
Unknown 16 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Professor 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 7 41%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 6%
Unknown 10 59%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2026.
All research outputs
#7,959,162
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Virus Research
#925
of 3,301 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,870
of 122,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Virus Research
#7
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,301 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,234 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.