↓ Skip to main content

Impact of gastrointestinal parasitic nematodes of sheep, and the role of advanced molecular tools for exploring epidemiology and drug resistance - an Australian perspective

Overview of attention for article published in Parasites & Vectors, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
245 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
453 Mendeley
Title
Impact of gastrointestinal parasitic nematodes of sheep, and the role of advanced molecular tools for exploring epidemiology and drug resistance - an Australian perspective
Published in
Parasites & Vectors, May 2013
DOI 10.1186/1756-3305-6-153
Pubmed ID
Authors

Florian Roeber, Aaron R Jex, Robin B Gasser

Abstract

Parasitic nematodes (roundworms) of small ruminants and other livestock have major economic impacts worldwide. Despite the impact of the diseases caused by these nematodes and the discovery of new therapeutic agents (anthelmintics), there has been relatively limited progress in the development of practical molecular tools to study the epidemiology of these nematodes. Specific diagnosis underpins parasite control, and the detection and monitoring of anthelmintic resistance in livestock parasites, presently a major concern around the world. The purpose of the present article is to provide a concise account of the biology and knowledge of the epidemiology of the gastrointestinal nematodes (order Strongylida), from an Australian perspective, and to emphasize the importance of utilizing advanced molecular tools for the specific diagnosis of nematode infections for refined investigations of parasite epidemiology and drug resistance detection in combination with conventional methods. It also gives a perspective on the possibility of harnessing genetic, genomic and bioinformatic technologies to better understand parasites and control parasitic diseases.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 453 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Unknown 444 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 79 17%
Student > Bachelor 64 14%
Student > Master 50 11%
Researcher 41 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 27 6%
Other 69 15%
Unknown 123 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 130 29%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 77 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 40 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 2%
Other 40 9%
Unknown 139 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2017.
All research outputs
#2,639,902
of 24,584,609 outputs
Outputs from Parasites & Vectors
#515
of 5,776 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,144
of 199,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasites & Vectors
#6
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,584,609 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,776 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,066 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.