↓ Skip to main content

局所慣性方程式の安定性解析の進展

Overview of attention for article published in JOURNAL OF JAPAN SOCIETY OF HYDROLOGY AND WATER RESOURCES, February 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
局所慣性方程式の安定性解析の進展
Published in
JOURNAL OF JAPAN SOCIETY OF HYDROLOGY AND WATER RESOURCES, February 2024
DOI 10.3178/jjshwr.37.1817
Authors

田中 智大, 山崎 大, 吉岡 秀和, 木村 匡臣

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2024.
All research outputs
#7,530,450
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from JOURNAL OF JAPAN SOCIETY OF HYDROLOGY AND WATER RESOURCES
#5
of 48 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,592
of 340,539 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JOURNAL OF JAPAN SOCIETY OF HYDROLOGY AND WATER RESOURCES
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 48 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one scored the same or higher as 43 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,539 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.