↓ Skip to main content

MDシミュレーションによるDNAナノポアのイオン輸送解析

Overview of attention for article published in Seibutsu-kogaku Kaishi, August 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
MDシミュレーションによるDNAナノポアのイオン輸送解析
Published in
Seibutsu-kogaku Kaishi, August 2023
DOI 10.34565/seibutsukogaku.101.8_418
Authors

馬渕 拓哉, 高橋 潤

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2023.
All research outputs
#15,840,332
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Seibutsu-kogaku Kaishi
#37
of 65 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,976
of 358,821 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Seibutsu-kogaku Kaishi
#10
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 65 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,821 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.