↓ Skip to main content

Macrocircuits for Sound Localization Use Leaky Coincidence Detectors and Specialized Synapses

Overview of attention for article published in Neuron, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Macrocircuits for Sound Localization Use Leaky Coincidence Detectors and Specialized Synapses
Published in
Neuron, June 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.05.034
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The auditory system computes sound location by detecting submillisecond time differences in the arrival of sound at the two ears. Studies by van der Heijden et al. (2013) and Roberts et al. (2013) in this issue of Neuron shed light on how this is accomplished by the interaction of excitatory and inhibitory synapses.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 4%
Germany 2 4%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 45 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 26%
Researcher 10 20%
Student > Master 5 10%
Student > Postgraduate 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 8 16%
Unknown 7 14%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 48%
Neuroscience 12 24%
Psychology 2 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 9 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2013.
All research outputs
#20,656,161
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Neuron
#9,170
of 9,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,678
of 206,481 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuron
#89
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,543 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,481 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.