↓ Skip to main content

Health reform for children: the Egyptian experience with school health insurance

Overview of attention for article published in Health Policy, January 2000
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Health reform for children: the Egyptian experience with school health insurance
Published in
Health Policy, January 2000
DOI 10.1016/s0168-8510(99)00073-1
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

In June 1992, the People's Assembly of Egypt passed Law 99 expanding health insurance to cover all school children. This was one of the most important initiatives undertaken in recent years by the Ministry of Health, and it effectively increased the number of beneficiaries covered by the Health Insurance Organization (HIO) from 3.75 million in 1988 to about 14 million in 1993. This paper first examines the policy processes for the introduction of this innovation in Egypt's health system. Next, the paper discusses the implementation and consequences of the new policy in terms of coverage, financing, benefits, and delivery of services, along with data on utilization and expenditures. Several important lessons derive from this analysis. First, major reform efforts are possible when there is a strong political commitment and the proposed program and solutions are acceptable to the key stakeholders. Second, compromises and trade-offs are essential to construct a politically feasible and ethically acceptable reform initiative. Third, while these trade-offs might yield short-term gains, the trade-offs in the long term may undermine the reform's capacity to achieve the anticipated equity enhancements and can potentially undermine the financial sustainability of the reform.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
India 1 2%
Switzerland 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 45 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 15%
Student > Master 6 13%
Student > Postgraduate 3 6%
Other 2 4%
Other 8 17%
Unknown 14 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 23%
Social Sciences 7 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 10%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 8%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 17 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2019.
All research outputs
#6,087,335
of 27,782,313 outputs
Outputs from Health Policy
#972
of 3,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,056
of 119,590 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Policy
#5
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,782,313 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,025 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,590 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.