↓ Skip to main content

Clinical and Microbiological Characteristics of Severe Group A Streptococcus Infections and Streptococcal Toxic Shock Syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Infectious Diseases, August 1995
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Clinical and Microbiological Characteristics of Severe Group A Streptococcus Infections and Streptococcal Toxic Shock Syndrome
Published in
Clinical Infectious Diseases, August 1995
DOI 10.1093/clinids/21.2.333
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

We have monitored all cases of invasive group A streptococcus (GAS) infection that have occurred at the New York Hospital (New York) since 1989. Five cases of GAS infection and shock were identified between 1990 and 1991, and an additional case was recently identified at an affiliated hospital. Five of the six patients met the case definition for streptococcal toxic shock syndrome (strep TSS). Three were bacteremic, and four had aggressive soft-tissue infections. Patients with shock, for whom the mortality was higher, had fewer underlying illnesses than did patients who had GAS bacteremia without shock. Although the M1 serotype and production of streptococcal pyrogenic exotoxin A were more common in patients with GAS infection and shock, several patients with strep TSS were infected with a nontypable strain of GAS that produced only streptococcal pyrogenic exotoxin B. In addition, we observed a distinctive early hemodynamic profile for patients with strep TSS that was unlike that for patients who had typical gram-negative septic shock; this profile was consistent with toxic cardiomyopathy (i.e., relatively low cardiac output, low-to-normal systemic vascular resistance, and striking reduction in ventricular performance.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 9%
Unknown 10 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 18%
Student > Postgraduate 2 18%
Other 1 9%
Lecturer 1 9%
Student > Bachelor 1 9%
Other 3 27%
Unknown 1 9%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 82%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 9%
Unknown 1 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2018.
All research outputs
#7,317,061
of 33,738,238 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Infectious Diseases
#10,441
of 20,596 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,467
of 32,834 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Infectious Diseases
#29
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,738,238 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,596 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.1. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 32,834 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.