↓ Skip to main content

Posttranscriptional Control of T Cell Effector Function by Aerobic Glycolysis

Overview of attention for article published in Cell, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
1699 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Posttranscriptional Control of T Cell Effector Function by Aerobic Glycolysis
Published in
Cell, June 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.cell.2013.05.016
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

A "switch" from oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) to aerobic glycolysis is a hallmark of T cell activation and is thought to be required to meet the metabolic demands of proliferation. However, why proliferating cells adopt this less efficient metabolism, especially in an oxygen-replete environment, remains incompletely understood. We show here that aerobic glycolysis is specifically required for effector function in T cells but that this pathway is not necessary for proliferation or survival. When activated T cells are provided with costimulation and growth factors but are blocked from engaging glycolysis, their ability to produce IFN-γ is markedly compromised. This defect is translational and is regulated by the binding of the glycolysis enzyme GAPDH to AU-rich elements within the 3' UTR of IFN-γ mRNA. GAPDH, by engaging/disengaging glycolysis and through fluctuations in its expression, controls effector cytokine production. Thus, aerobic glycolysis is a metabolically regulated signaling mechanism needed to control cellular function.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,699 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 9 <1%
United Kingdom 6 <1%
France 4 <1%
Japan 3 <1%
Russia 2 <1%
Argentina 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Unknown 1671 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 383 23%
Researcher 291 17%
Student > Master 155 9%
Student > Bachelor 138 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 80 5%
Other 236 14%
Unknown 416 24%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 369 22%
Immunology and Microbiology 323 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 263 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 154 9%
Engineering 27 2%
Other 120 7%
Unknown 443 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2026.
All research outputs
#1,159,576
of 33,779,198 outputs
Outputs from Cell
#4,527
of 19,351 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,700
of 237,541 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell
#33
of 134 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,779,198 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,351 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 63.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 237,541 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 134 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.