You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Novel T1 Analysis Method to Address Reduced Measurement Accuracy Due to Irregular Heart Rate Variability in Myocardial T1 Mapping Using Polarity-corrected Inversion Time Preparation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Magnetic resonance in medical sciences MRMS an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, September 2023
|
| DOI | 10.2463/mrms.mp.2023-0029 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yuta Endo, Sanae Takahashi, Haruna Shibo, Makoto Amanuma, Kuninori Kobayashi, Shigehide Kuhara |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2023.
All research outputs
#17,637,892
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Magnetic resonance in medical sciences MRMS an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
#182
of 342 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#200,915
of 357,924 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Magnetic resonance in medical sciences MRMS an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 342 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,924 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them