↓ Skip to main content

Systemic diseases associated with various types of retinal vein occlusion

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Ophthalmology, January 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
guideline
2 clinical guideline sources

Readers on

mendeley
134 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Systemic diseases associated with various types of retinal vein occlusion
Published in
American Journal of Ophthalmology, January 2001
DOI 10.1016/s0002-9394(00)00709-1
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To investigate systemic diseases associated with various types of retinal vein occlusion. We investigated prospectively in 1090 consecutive patients with retinal vein occlusion, almost all Caucasian (consistent with the racial pattern here), the prevalence of associated systemic disorders before or at the onset of various types of retinal vein occlusion. The patients were categorized into six types of retinal vein occlusion based on defined criteria: nonischemic and ischemic central retinal vein occlusion, nonischemic and ischemic hemi-central retinal vein occlusion, and major and macular branch retinal vein occlusion. The patients had a detailed ophthalmic and systemic evaluation according to our protocol. For data analysis, patients were divided into three age groups: young (younger than 45 years), middle-aged (45 to 64 years), and elderly (65 years or older). The observed prevalence rates of major systemic diseases were compared among central retinal vein occlusion, hemi-central retinal vein occlusion, and branch retinal vein occlusion using a polytomous logistic regression analysis adjusting for gender and age. Logistic regression adjusting for age and gender was also used to compare the observed prevalence of systemic disease between nonischemic and ischemic in central retinal vein occlusion and hemi-central retinal vein occlusion and between major and macular branch retinal vein occlusion. These observed prevalence rates were also compared with those expected in a gender-matched and age-matched control population from estimates from the US National Center for Health Statistics. There was a significantly higher prevalence of arterial hypertension in branch retinal vein occlusion compared with central retinal vein occlusion (P < .0001) and hemi-central retinal vein occlusion (P = .028). Branch retinal vein occlusion also had a significantly higher prevalence of peripheral vascular disease (P = .0002), venous disease (P = .011), peptic ulcer (P = .031), and other gastrointestinal disease (P < .0001) compared with central retinal vein occlusion. The proportion of patients with branch retinal vein occlusion with cerebrovascular disease was also significantly (P = .049) greater than that of the combined group of patients with central retinal vein occlusion and patients with hemi-central retinal vein occlusion. There was no significant difference in prevalence of any systemic disease between central retinal vein occlusion and hemi-central retinal vein occlusion. A significantly greater prevalence of arterial hypertension (P = .025) and diabetes mellitus (P = .011) was present in the ischemic central retinal vein occlusion compared with the nonischemic central retinal vein occlusion. Similarly, arterial hypertension (P = .0002) and ischemic heart disease (P = .048) were more prevalent in major branch retinal vein occlusion than in macular branch retinal vein occlusion. Relative to the US white control population, the combined group of patients with central retinal vein occlusion and patients with hemi-central retinal vein occlusion had a higher prevalence of arterial hypertension (P < .0001), peptic ulcer (P < .0001), diabetes mellitus (in ischemic type only, P < .0001), and thyroid disorder (P < .0001). The patients with branch retinal vein occlusion showed a greater prevalence of arterial hypertension (P < or = .005), cerebrovascular disease (P = .007), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (P = .012), peptic ulcer (P < .0001), diabetes (in young only, P = .0005), and thyroid disorder (P = .003) compared with the US white control population. The findings of our study revealed that a variety of systemic disorders may be present in association with different types of retinal vein occlusion and in different age groups, and that their relative prevalence differs significantly, so that the common practice of generalizing about these disorders for the entire group of patients with retinal vein occlusion can be misleading. The presence of a particular associated systemic disease does not necessarily imply a cause-and-effect relationship with that type of retinal vein occlusion; the particular disease may or may not be one of the risk factors in a multifactorial scenario predisposing an eye to develop a particular type of retinal vein occlusion. Based on our study, we think that apart from a routine medical evaluation, an extensive and expensive workup for systemic diseases is unwarranted in the vast majority of patients with retinal vein occlusion.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Mexico 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 131 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 15 11%
Student > Bachelor 13 10%
Student > Master 11 8%
Researcher 10 7%
Other 9 7%
Other 31 23%
Unknown 45 34%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 73 54%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 2%
Computer Science 2 1%
Environmental Science 1 <1%
Other 6 4%
Unknown 45 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2019.
All research outputs
#5,155,379
of 34,457,357 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Ophthalmology
#986
of 8,858 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,525
of 161,784 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Ophthalmology
#1
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,457,357 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,858 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 161,784 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.