You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
九州南西部および種子島から採集された標本に基づく稀種Grynaminna tamakii Poore, 2000センニンスナモグリ(新称)(十脚目:アナエビ下目:オオスナモグリ科)の新産地記録
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cancer (0008543X), September 2023
|
| DOI | 10.18988/cancer.32.0_9 |
| Authors |
是枝 伶旺, 清水 直人, 駒井 智幸 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2023.
All research outputs
#21,049,824
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Cancer (0008543X)
#13,269
of 14,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#257,232
of 358,433 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer (0008543X)
#108
of 129 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,220 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,433 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 129 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.