↓ Skip to main content

Oral Selinexor as Maintenance Therapy After First-Line Chemotherapy for Advanced or Recurrent Endometrial Cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Oncology, September 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
22 X users
reddit
2 Redditors
video
1 YouTube creator
guideline
2 clinical guideline sources
podcasts
1 podcast

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Oral Selinexor as Maintenance Therapy After First-Line Chemotherapy for Advanced or Recurrent Endometrial Cancer
Published in
Journal of Clinical Oncology, September 2023
DOI 10.1200/jco.22.02906
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ignace Vergote, Jose Alejandro Pérez-Fidalgo, Erika Paige Hamilton, Giorgio Valabrega, Toon Van Gorp, Jalid Sehouli, David Cibula, Tally Levy, Stephen Welch, Debra L. Richardson, Eva M. Guerra, Giovanni Scambia, Stéphanie Henry, Pauline Wimberger, David S. Miller, Jaroslav Klat, Jerónimo Martínez-Garcia, Francesco Raspagliesi, Bhavana Pothuri, Ignacio Romero, Alice Bergamini, Brian Slomovitz, Fabienne Schochter, Estrid Høgdall, Lorena Fariñas-Madrid, Bradley J. Monk, Dayana Michel, Michael G. Kauffman, Sharon Shacham, Mansoor Raza Mirza, Vicky Makker, Ignace Vergote, Toon Van Gorp, Isabelle Cadron, Annelore Barbeaux, Nathalie Cornez, Stephanie Henry, Joseph Kerger, Debbie Debaere, Hannelore Denys, Mansoor Raza Mirza, Amit Oza, Lucy Gilbert, Stephen Welch, Michael Kolinsky, Qi Zhou, Jing Wang, Yingjie Yang, Kaijia Tu, Li Wang, Danbo Wang, Ge Lou, Xiaojian Yan, Jiaxin Yang, David Cibula, Jaroslav Klat, Bohuslav Melichar, Michal Zikan, Klaudia Reginacova, Vit Weinberger, Jalid Sehouli, Pauline Wimberger, Dirk Bauerschlag, Fabian Trillsch, Oliver Tome, Fabienne Schochter, Marco Battista, Bahriye Aktas, Kristina Luebbe, Mustafa Deryal, George Fountzilas, Athina Christopoulou, Christos Papadimitriou, Flora Zagouri, Limor Helpman, Tamar Safra, Tally Levy, Ilan Bruchim, Ora Rosengarten, Aviad Zick, Giorgio Valabrega, Giovanni Scambia, Giorgia Mangili, Francesco Raspagliesi, Carmela Pisano, Donata Sartori, Ugo de Giorgi, Jose Alejandro Perez-Fidalgo, Cesar Gomez-Raposo, Ignacio Romero, Maria Iglesias, Ana Santaballa, Nerea Ancizar, Purificación Estévez, Constanza Maximiano, Alfonso Yubero, Ana Oaknin, Eva Guerra, Lydia Gaba, Jeronimo Martinez, Emma Dotor, Vicky Makker, Debra Richardson, Jonathan Berek, Hye Sook Chon, Joseph Buscema, Meaghan Tenney, David Miller, Gregory Sutton, Daniel Spitz, Kristopher LyBarger, Erika Hamilton, Gregory Gilmore, Merrill Shum, Harshad Amin, Leslie Randall, Bhavana Pothuri, Katina Robison, Jonathan Boone, Joyce Barlin, Sharad Ghamande, Alfred Guirguis, Sudarshan Sharma, Iwona Podzielinski, Lisa Landrum, Nicole Nevadunsky, Amanda Jackson, Eirwen Miller, Radhika Gogoi, Bradley Monk, Restituto Tibayan, Noelle Cloven, Joseph de la Garza, Christine Lee, Carolyn Mathews, Anna Priebe, Michael Teneriello, Charles Anderson, Bhavana Pothuri, Fabio Cappuccini, David Miller, Michael G. Kaufman, Sharon Shacham, Yosef Landesman, Christopher J. Walker, Xulong Wang, Feng Wang, Changting Meng, Dayana Michel, Patricia Judson, Reshma Rangwala

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 10%
Student > Master 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Professor 2 6%
Other 6 19%
Unknown 13 42%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 39%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Unknown 16 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 57. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2026.
All research outputs
#953,812
of 34,492,055 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Oncology
#2,429
of 32,547 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,538
of 384,099 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Oncology
#40
of 139 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,492,055 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,547 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 384,099 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 139 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.