You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
CATastrophic myths part 1: Common misconceptions about the social behavior of domestic cats and implications for their health, welfare, and management
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Veterinary Journal, September 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.tvjl.2023.106028 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Candace Croney, Monique Udell, Mikel Delgado, Kari Ekenstedt, Anna Kate Shoveller |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 63 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 15 | 24% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 10% |
| Germany | 3 | 5% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Nicaragua | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| China | 1 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 27 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 46 | 73% |
| Scientists | 14 | 22% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 3 | 13% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Researcher | 1 | 4% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 16 | 70% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 3 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 15 | 65% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 44. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2023.
All research outputs
#970,147
of 25,909,281 outputs
Outputs from Veterinary Journal
#42
of 2,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,313
of 359,449 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Veterinary Journal
#1
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,909,281 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,485 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,449 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.