↓ Skip to main content

Phylogenomic and morphological data reveal hidden patterns of diversity in the national tree of Brazil, Paubrasilia echinata

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Botany, October 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
11 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Phylogenomic and morphological data reveal hidden patterns of diversity in the national tree of Brazil, Paubrasilia echinata
Published in
American Journal of Botany, October 2023
DOI 10.1002/ajb2.16241
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Paubrasilia echinata (Lam.) Gagnon, H. C. Lima & G. P. Lewis ("Pau Brasil") is the national tree of Brazil, an endangered species endemic to the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. The wide distribution, spanning over 2000 km, matches extensive plasticity in leaf morphology. Three morphotypes are commonly identified based on leaf size but it is unclear if they represent distinct taxa or a single polymorphic species. This study aims to clarify the taxonomic position of the three morphotypes to inform conservation decisions. A morphometric study based on leaf characters of herbarium specimens was coupled with genetic analyses using genotype-by-sequencing data. We used maximum-likelihood and coalescent methods to evaluate the phylogenetic and population structure of the species. We compared these with a morphological dendrogram built from hierarchical clustering. We found that two of the three morphotypes formed separately evolving lineages, that the third morphotype formed two geographically separate lineages, and that northern trees with intermediate leaf morphology formed a separate fifth lineage. Leaflet size varied by over 35-fold and although morphological clustering generally matched the genetic patterns, there were some overlaps, highlighting the cryptic diversity within this group. Our genetic and morphological results provide some evidence that cultivated trees from different states in Brazil seem to be of limited genetic origin and do not reflect the broader genetic and geographical diversity of the species. This suggests that more care is needed to protect and preserve the overall genomic diversity of this endangered and iconic species. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 2 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 9%
Researcher 2 9%
Other 1 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 13 59%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 32%
Environmental Science 1 5%
Engineering 1 5%
Unknown 13 59%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2024.
All research outputs
#2,755,140
of 29,242,148 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Botany
#385
of 4,829 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,390
of 383,227 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Botany
#8
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,242,148 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,829 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 383,227 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.