↓ Skip to main content

A Laboratory-Developed Assay for Clade II Human Mpox Virus on the Panther Fusion Open Access System

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Infectious Diseases, September 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A Laboratory-Developed Assay for Clade II Human Mpox Virus on the Panther Fusion Open Access System
Published in
Journal of Infectious Diseases, September 2023
DOI 10.1093/infdis/jiad347
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

In May 2022, an exported mpox case was confirmed in the United Kingdom, eventually evolving into a multi-country outbreak. In response, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommended the Non-variola Orthopoxvirus Generic Real-Time PCR Test for public health labs to test clinical samples; however, this method is not clade specific and was originally designed as a low-volume screening assay. Therefore, aspects of the test (timeliness, labor costs, and workflow efficiency) required improvement if high-volume testing were to become necessary. Here, we describe the process for developing and optimizing a laboratory developed assay (LDA) for detecting clade II mpox virus using the automated Panther Fusion platform and Open Access software. Various concentrations of reagents in a primer-probe mix were tested to optimize the LDA. The LDA was validated using 10 previously characterized positive and 10 negative human mpox samples, resulting in 95% accuracy and 100% precision. The LDA resulted in 100% specificity among previously tested HSV1, HSV2, and VZV positive human samples. Several spiked media extensions (Aptima Multitest Swab Transport Media, RTM4, an in-house Universal Transport Medium, and dry swabs) were also validated and achieved 98% accuracy and 100% precision across all collection media types. The assay's LOD was calculated to be 1.475 copies/reaction, and the PCR efficiency resulted in 89.87% (slope: -3.5911, R2: 0.9947). The methods described in this paper can be applied to the rapid optimization and development of LDAs for many possible pathogens of public health importance.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 1 25%
Unknown 3 75%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 1 25%
Unknown 3 75%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2023.
All research outputs
#23,318,202
of 34,387,656 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Infectious Diseases
#16,549
of 18,984 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#205,584
of 383,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Infectious Diseases
#147
of 206 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,387,656 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 18,984 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.0. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 383,216 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 206 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.