You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Development of convective heat transport in nanofluid flow of Oldroyd‐B model with magnetic dipole moment
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
ZAMM -- Journal of Applied Mathematics & Mechanics / Zeitschrift für Angewandte Mathematik und Mechanik, August 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1002/zamm.202200564 |
| Authors |
Shuguang Li, Sami Ullah Khan, Kamel Al‐Khaled, Ezza Ali, M. Ijaz Khan, Khalda Mohamed Ahmed Elamin, Bandar M. Fadhl, Basim M. Makhdoum |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2022.
All research outputs
#17,301,727
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from ZAMM -- Journal of Applied Mathematics & Mechanics / Zeitschrift für Angewandte Mathematik und Mechanik
#218
of 304 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#197,756
of 354,040 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ZAMM -- Journal of Applied Mathematics & Mechanics / Zeitschrift für Angewandte Mathematik und Mechanik
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 304 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,040 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.