Development of a multi-sample acquisition technique for efficient planetary subsurface exploration

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Astronautica, September 2022

Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news: 14 news outlets

Readers on

mendeley: 5 Mendeley

You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.

Article details
Title	Development of a multi-sample acquisition technique for efficient planetary subsurface exploration
Published in	Acta Astronautica, September 2022
DOI	10.1016/j.actaastro.2022.06.008
Authors	Craig Pitcher, Xavier Pang, Mohamed Alkalla, Yang Gao

View on publisher site Alert me about new mentions

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline

Activity

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 105. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2024.

All research outputs

#441,943

of 27,790,740 outputs

Outputs from Acta Astronautica

#74

of 2,315 outputs

Outputs of similar age

#11,010

of 437,934 outputs

Outputs of similar age from Acta Astronautica

of 47 outputs

Altmetric has tracked 27,790,740 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.

So far Altmetric has tracked 2,315 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.

Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,934 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.

We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.