↓ Skip to main content

Brimonidine Allergy Presenting as Vernal-like Keratoconjunctivitis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Glaucoma, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Brimonidine Allergy Presenting as Vernal-like Keratoconjunctivitis
Published in
Journal of Glaucoma, January 2015
DOI 10.1097/ijg.0b013e3182953aef
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

PURPOSE:: To report a brimonidone-induced allergic reaction that mimicked a limbal form of vernal keratoconjunctivitis in the setting of background ocular surface toxicity. PATIENTS AND METHODS:: A 78-year-old male with a history of primary open angle glaucoma presented with symptoms of unilateral blurry vision, irritation, and redness shortly after starting brimonidine exclusively in the right eye. Examination revealed injected palpebral and bulbar conjunctiva, diffuse punctate epithelial erosion and discrete, non-staining corneal limbal infiltrates superiorly. RESULTS:: Given the unilateral presentation, the patient was diagnosed with an allergic limbal keratoconjunctivitis secondary to bromonidine. Shortly after discontinuing the brimonidine, there was full resolution of the corneal limbal infiltrates. The punctate epithelial erosions and tear film abnormalities remained. CONCLUSION:: Direct medication allergy and ocular surface disease are two distinct entities that often co-exist. Distinguishing between the two entities, sometimes by trial and error, is critical in the management of these patients.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 14%
Other 2 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 9%
Librarian 1 5%
Other 4 18%
Unknown 7 32%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 36%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 14%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Computer Science 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2015.
All research outputs
#17,286,379
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Glaucoma
#1,649
of 2,829 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#220,172
of 359,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Glaucoma
#79
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,829 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,538 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.