You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Woody Debris Volume Depletion Through Decay: Implications for Biomass and Carbon Accounting
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ecosystems, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10021-013-9682-z |
| Authors |
Shawn Fraver, Amy M. Milo, John B. Bradford, Anthony W. D’Amato, Laura Kenefic, Brian J. Palik, Christopher W. Woodall, John Brissette |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | 25% |
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 114 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 16% |
| Researcher | 17 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 17 | 14% |
| Unknown | 23 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 34 | 29% |
| Environmental Science | 30 | 25% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 5% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 3% |
| Psychology | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Unknown | 34 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2013.
All research outputs
#16,389,235
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Ecosystems
#1,156
of 1,446 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,238
of 214,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecosystems
#13
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,446 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 214,023 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.