↓ Skip to main content

RNA Binding to CBP Stimulates Histone Acetylation and Transcription

Overview of attention for article published in Cell, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
59 X users
patent
2 patents
reddit
2 Redditors
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
648 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
RNA Binding to CBP Stimulates Histone Acetylation and Transcription
Published in
Cell, January 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.cell.2016.12.020
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

CBP/p300 are transcription co-activators whose binding is a signature of enhancers, cis-regulatory elements that control patterns of gene expression in multicellular organisms. Active enhancers produce bi-directional enhancer RNAs (eRNAs) and display CBP/p300-dependent histone acetylation. Here, we demonstrate that CBP binds directly to RNAs in vivo and in vitro. RNAs bound to CBP in vivo include a large number of eRNAs. Using steady-state histone acetyltransferase (HAT) assays, we show that an RNA binding region in the HAT domain of CBP-a regulatory motif unique to CBP/p300-allows RNA to stimulate CBP's HAT activity. At enhancers where CBP interacts with eRNAs, stimulation manifests in RNA-dependent changes in the histone acetylation mediated by CBP, such as H3K27ac, and by corresponding changes in gene expression. By interacting directly with CBP, eRNAs contribute to the unique chromatin structure at active enhancers, which, in turn, is required for regulation of target genes.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 59 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 648 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 4 <1%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Norway 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Austria 2 <1%
Unknown 634 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 161 25%
Researcher 98 15%
Student > Bachelor 64 10%
Student > Master 62 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 39 6%
Other 87 13%
Unknown 137 21%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 265 41%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 145 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 3%
Neuroscience 20 3%
Chemistry 17 3%
Other 27 4%
Unknown 154 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2025.
All research outputs
#1,315,909
of 32,125,052 outputs
Outputs from Cell
#4,813
of 19,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,504
of 449,922 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell
#83
of 144 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,125,052 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,025 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 62.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,922 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 144 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.