↓ Skip to main content

Suitability of Amphibians and Reptiles for Translocation

Overview of attention for article published in Conservation Biology, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
policy
4 policy sources
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
695 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Suitability of Amphibians and Reptiles for Translocation
Published in
Conservation Biology, January 2009
DOI 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01123.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 695 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 9 1%
Brazil 9 1%
United Kingdom 8 1%
Australia 3 <1%
Peru 2 <1%
New Zealand 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Other 9 1%
Unknown 649 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 161 23%
Researcher 101 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 95 14%
Student > Bachelor 82 12%
Other 47 7%
Other 99 14%
Unknown 110 16%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 359 52%
Environmental Science 137 20%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 20 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 1%
Other 24 3%
Unknown 128 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 69. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2026.
All research outputs
#766,654
of 32,948,899 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Biology
#349
of 5,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,385
of 241,310 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Biology
#3
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,948,899 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,014 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,310 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.