You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Mitigating human–wildlife conflict and monitoring endangered tigers using a real-time camera-based alert system
|
---|---|
Published in |
BioScience, September 2023
|
DOI | 10.1093/biosci/biad076 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jeremy S Dertien, Hrishita Negi, Eric Dinerstein, Ramesh Krishnamurthy, Himmat Singh Negi, Rajesh Gopal, Steve Gulick, Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Mohnish Kapoor, Piyush Yadav, Mijail Benitez, Miguel Ferreira, A J Wijnveen, Andy T L Lee, Brett Wright, Robert F Baldwin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
India | 2 | 11% |
Australia | 2 | 11% |
Norway | 1 | 5% |
Portugal | 1 | 5% |
Nepal | 1 | 5% |
Germany | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 11 | 58% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 10 | 53% |
Scientists | 8 | 42% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 31 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 7 | 23% |
Unspecified | 5 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Lecturer | 1 | 3% |
Other | 3 | 10% |
Unknown | 12 | 39% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 5 | 16% |
Environmental Science | 4 | 13% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 13% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 3% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
Other | 3 | 10% |
Unknown | 13 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 174. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2023.
All research outputs
#235,405
of 25,661,882 outputs
Outputs from BioScience
#86
of 2,611 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,294
of 354,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioScience
#3
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,661,882 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,611 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,328 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.