You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Attention over time
Attention Score history
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Development and implementation of ‘A guide to PPIE – Early Integration into Research Proposals’ in a multi-disciplinary consortium
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Rheumatology, September 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1093/rheumatology/kead482 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Richard Beesley, Freya Luling Feilding, Richard Beesley, Sharon Douglas, Emily Earle, Nick Gannon, Kerry Leslie, Eilean MacDonald, Debbie Wilson, Catherine Wright, Elizabeth C Rosser, Stephanie J W Shoop-Worrall, Alyssia McNeece, Zoe Wanstall, Kimme Hyrich, Lucy R Wedderburn, Lucy R Wedderburn, Melissa Kartawinata, Zoe Wanstall, Bethany R Jebson, Freya Luling Feilding, Alyssia McNeece, Elizabeth Ralph, Vasiliki Alexiou, Fatjon Dekaj, Aline Kimonyo, Fatema Merali, Emma Sumner, Emily Robinson, Andrew Dick, Michael W Beresford, Emil Carlsson, Joanna Fairlie, Jenna F Gritzfeld, Athimalaipet Ramanan, Teresa Duerr, Michael Barnes, Sandra Ng, Kimme Hyrich, Stephen Eyre, Soumya Raychaudhuri, Andrew Morris, Annie Yarwood, Samantha Smith, Stevie Shoop-Worrall, Saskia Lawson-Tovey, John Bowes, Paul Martin, Melissa Tordoff, Jeronee Jennycloss, Michael Stadler, Wendy Thomson, Damian Tarasek, Chris Wallace, Wei-Yu Lin, Nophar Geifman, Sarah Clarke, Victoria J Burton, Thierry Sornasse, Daniela Dastros-Pitei, Sumanta Mukherjee, Michael McLean, Anna Barkaway, Victoria Basey, Peyman Adjamian, Helen Neale, John Ioannou, Hussein Al-Mossawi |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 15 | 71% |
| Unknown | 6 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 90% |
| Scientists | 1 | 5% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 2 | 13% |
| Researcher | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 11 | 73% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 2 | 13% |
| Engineering | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 12 | 80% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2023.
All research outputs
#2,529,214
of 31,889,638 outputs
Outputs from Rheumatology
#973
of 8,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,468
of 369,518 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Rheumatology
#16
of 126 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,889,638 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,991 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,518 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 126 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.