↓ Skip to main content

Abandonment of infants by HIV-positive women in Russia and prevention measures

Overview of attention for article published in Reproductive Health Matters, June 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
134 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Abandonment of infants by HIV-positive women in Russia and prevention measures
Published in
Reproductive Health Matters, June 2009
DOI 10.1016/s0968-8080(09)33438-2
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Since 1990, Russia has experienced a dramatic increase in the number of abandoned children, associated with harsh socio-economic conditions, increases in drug and alcohol addiction and HIV infection. Approximately 20% of infants born to HIV-positive mothers are abandoned in Russia. To find out why, we conducted 266 qualitative interviews in 2004-05 in four Russian cities, including HIV-positive women who had abandoned their infants and others who had not, relatives of the women (mostly their mothers), HIV-negative women who had abandoned, and medical experts. Unintended pregnancy was cited as the most important factor influencing the decision to abandon. Other important determinants included lack of partner and family support, drug abuse, fear of birth defects or disabilities, negative attitudes of medical professionals, and marginalized socio-economic status. HIV infection was closely linked to many of these reasons. Important avenues for interventions among HIV-positive women emerged, including improved contraceptive information and provision, education of medical personnel and women on HIV prevention and treatment, enhancement of social support, and strengthening of fostering and adoption programmes for HIV-affected families.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 130 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 18%
Researcher 20 15%
Student > Master 17 13%
Student > Bachelor 14 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 4%
Other 15 11%
Unknown 38 28%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 24 18%
Social Sciences 22 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Other 13 10%
Unknown 44 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2021.
All research outputs
#8,783,469
of 25,986,827 outputs
Outputs from Reproductive Health Matters
#9
of 9 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,535
of 125,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reproductive Health Matters
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,986,827 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 125,647 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.