↓ Skip to main content

A comparative study of Li-ion battery, supercapacitor and nonaqueous asymmetric hybrid devices for automotive applications

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Power Sources, March 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

patent
7 patents

Readers on

mendeley
628 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A comparative study of Li-ion battery, supercapacitor and nonaqueous asymmetric hybrid devices for automotive applications
Published in
Journal of Power Sources, March 2003
DOI 10.1016/s0378-7753(02)00718-8
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 628 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 4 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
India 2 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Other 4 <1%
Unknown 609 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 160 25%
Student > Master 101 16%
Researcher 75 12%
Student > Bachelor 32 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 24 4%
Other 68 11%
Unknown 168 27%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 126 20%
Chemistry 122 19%
Materials Science 102 16%
Energy 21 3%
Physics and Astronomy 17 3%
Other 41 7%
Unknown 199 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2020.
All research outputs
#6,780,480
of 31,591,940 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Power Sources
#1,668
of 12,346 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,397
of 81,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Power Sources
#9
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,591,940 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,346 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,035 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.