You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The animal welfare, environmental impact, pest control functions, and disease effects of free‐ranging cats can be generalized and all are grounds for humanely reducing their numbers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Science and Practice, September 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1111/csp2.13018 |
| Authors |
Michael C. Calver, Linda Cherkassky, Michael V. Cove, Patricia A. Fleming, Christopher A. Lepczyk, Travis Longcore, John Marzluff, Catherine Rich, Grant Sizemore |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 371 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 81 | 22% |
| Spain | 50 | 13% |
| Mexico | 13 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 2% |
| India | 6 | 2% |
| United States | 5 | 1% |
| Chile | 5 | 1% |
| Japan | 5 | 1% |
| Peru | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 25 | 7% |
| Unknown | 173 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 321 | 87% |
| Scientists | 37 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 9 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 12 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 25% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 7 | 58% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 25% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 7 | 58% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 295. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2024.
All research outputs
#121,651
of 25,911,277 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Science and Practice
#9
of 1,099 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,265
of 358,598 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Science and Practice
#1
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,911,277 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,099 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,598 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.