↓ Skip to main content

Hypomorphic CDHR1 variants may result in retinitis pigmentosa with relative preservation of cone function

Overview of attention for article published in Ophthalmic Genetics, September 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#38 of 579)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hypomorphic CDHR1 variants may result in retinitis pigmentosa with relative preservation of cone function
Published in
Ophthalmic Genetics, September 2023
DOI 10.1080/13816810.2023.2255265
Pubmed ID
Authors

Soma Farag, Imran H. Yusuf, Maria Kaukonen, Laura J. Taylor, Peter Charbel Issa, Robert E. MacLaren

Abstract

Retinitis pigmentosa (RP) associated with biallelic variants in CDHR1 has rarely been reported, and detailed phenotyping data are not available. RP implies relative preservation of foveal cones, when compared to cone-rod dystrophy associated with biallelic null variants in CDHR1. We hypothesize that RP may occur in association with one or more hypomorphic CDHR1 alleles. Retrospective report of a 48-year-old patient with CDHR1-associated RP with a hypomorphic missense variant c.562 G>A, p. (Gly188Ser) and a novel, unreported variant affecting a canonical splice acceptor site (c.784-1 G>C). Clinical examination, multimodal retinal imaging, electroretinography, visual field testing, and mesopic microperimetry were undertaken 8 years apart. Scotopic microperimetry was also performed. The DNA sequence context of the variants was examined to identify theoretical CRISPR-Cas9 base-editing strategies. The patient presented at 35 years with a 12-year history of nyctalopia. His best corrected visual acuity was 20/20. Clinical presentation, multimodal retinal imaging studies, electroretinography, and mesopic microperimetry were typical of a progressive rod-cone dystrophy (i.e. classic RP). There were no scotomas within the central field as would be expected at this age in CDHR1-associated cone-rod dystrophy. Scotopic microperimetry suggested some preservation of macular cone over rod function, although both were severely impaired. A suitable CRISPR adenine base editor was identified that could theoretically correct the missense variant c.562 G>A, p. (Gly188Ser). CDHR1-associated RP shows a relative preservation of cone function in the presence of a presumed hypomorphic allele and may be considered a hypomorphic disease phenotype. Further work is required to identify modifying factors that determine disease phenotype since macular dystrophy, with relative sparing of rods, may also occur with hypomorphic CDHR1 alleles.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2024.
All research outputs
#7,121,416
of 25,658,139 outputs
Outputs from Ophthalmic Genetics
#38
of 579 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,908
of 355,353 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ophthalmic Genetics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,658,139 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 579 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,353 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them