You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
歯面コート材を塗布した象牙質表層の試作SS-OCTによる観察
|
---|---|
Published in |
The Japanese Journal of Conservative Dentistry, May 2015
|
DOI | 10.11471/shikahozon.58.164 |
Authors |
水上 英子, 後閑 由香, 山口 麻衣, 真鍋 厚史, 橋本 絵美, 荒木 和之, 宮﨑 隆 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2017.
All research outputs
#17,637,892
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from The Japanese Journal of Conservative Dentistry
#22
of 34 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170,643
of 280,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Japanese Journal of Conservative Dentistry
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one scored the same or higher as 12 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,121 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.