↓ Skip to main content

‘Even our physical buildings are f*cked’: navigating spatial shocks in women’s shelters during COVID-19 and recommendations for future resilience

Overview of attention for article published in Architectural Science Review, September 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
‘Even our physical buildings are f*cked’: navigating spatial shocks in women’s shelters during COVID-19 and recommendations for future resilience
Published in
Architectural Science Review, September 2023
DOI 10.1080/00038628.2023.2258832
Authors

Isobel McLean, Tara Mantler, Caitlin Burd, Jennifer C. D. MacGregor, Jill Veenendaal, C. Nadine Wathen, the Violence Against Women Services in a Pandemic Research Team

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2023.
All research outputs
#13,940,814
of 24,832,302 outputs
Outputs from Architectural Science Review
#80
of 156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,056
of 328,004 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Architectural Science Review
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,832,302 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,004 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them