You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Predator–prey interactions based on drillholes: A case study of turritelline gastropods from the Pleistocene Szekou Formation of Taiwan
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh: Earth Sciences, September 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1017/s1755691023000130 |
| Authors |
Ammu S. SENAN, Chia-Hsin HSU, Shih-Wei LEE, Lo-Yu CHANG, Li-Chun TSENG, Adiël A. KLOMPMAKER, Jih-Pai LIN |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2023.
All research outputs
#3,300,160
of 25,523,622 outputs
Outputs from Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh: Earth Sciences
#62
of 464 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,239
of 353,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh: Earth Sciences
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,523,622 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 464 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,955 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them