You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Chronic fatigue syndromes: real illnesses that people can recover from
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care, September 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1080/02813432.2023.2235609 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
The Oslo Chronic Fatigue Consortium, Tomas Nordheim Alme, Anna Andreasson, Tarjei Tørre Asprusten, Anne Karen Bakken, Michael BJ Beadsworth, Birgitte Boye, Per Alf Brodal, Elias Myrstad Brodwall, Kjetil Gundro Brurberg, Ingrid Bugge, Trudie Chalder, Reidar Due, Hege Randi Eriksen, Per Klausen Fink, Signe Agnes Flottorp, Egil Andreas Fors, Bård Fossli Jensen, Hans Petter Fundingsrud, Paul Garner, Lise Beier Havdal, Helene Helgeland, Henrik Børsting Jacobsen, Georg Espolin Johnson, Martin Jonsjö, Hans Knoop, Live Landmark, Gunvor Launes, Mats Lekander, Hannah Linnros, Elin Lindsäter, Helena Liira, Lina Linnestad, Jon Håvard Loge, Peter Solvoll Lyby, Sadaf Malik, Ulrik Fredrik Malt, Trygve Moe, Anna-Karin Norlin, Maria Pedersen, Siv Elin Pignatiello, Charlotte Ulrikka Rask, Silje Endresen Reme, Gisle Roksund, Markku Sainio, Michael Sharpe, Ruth Foseide Thorkildsen, Betty van Roy, Per Olav Vandvik, Henrik Vogt, Hedda Bratholm Wyller, Vegard Bruun Bratholm Wyller |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 335 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 40 | 12% |
| United States | 22 | 7% |
| Norway | 13 | 4% |
| Australia | 12 | 4% |
| Canada | 8 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 8 | 2% |
| Germany | 8 | 2% |
| Finland | 6 | 2% |
| Sweden | 5 | 1% |
| Other | 26 | 8% |
| Unknown | 187 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 285 | 85% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 21 | 6% |
| Scientists | 21 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 8 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 24 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 21% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 10 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 29% |
| Psychology | 3 | 13% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 10 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 311. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2024.
All research outputs
#112,464
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care
#2
of 846 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,092
of 358,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 846 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,142 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.