↓ Skip to main content

Reconstruction of vegetation changes on Atiu Island, southern Cook Islands, East Polynesia, based on pollen analysis: Verification of human impacts

Overview of attention for article published in The Quaternary Research (Daiyonki-Kenkyu), September 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reconstruction of vegetation changes on Atiu Island, southern Cook Islands, East Polynesia, based on pollen analysis: Verification of human impacts
Published in
The Quaternary Research (Daiyonki-Kenkyu), September 2023
DOI 10.4116/jaqua.62.2202
Authors

Toshiyuki Fujiki, Keisuke Sakai, Mitsuru Okuno

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2023.
All research outputs
#17,637,892
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from The Quaternary Research (Daiyonki-Kenkyu)
#162
of 216 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#194,408
of 347,393 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Quaternary Research (Daiyonki-Kenkyu)
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 216 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,393 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them