↓ Skip to main content

Best Practice in Post-Stroke Aphasia Services According to People with Lived Experience. A Modified Nominal Group Technique Study

Overview of attention for article published in Aphasiology, September 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#46 of 723)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
41 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Best Practice in Post-Stroke Aphasia Services According to People with Lived Experience. A Modified Nominal Group Technique Study
Published in
Aphasiology, September 2023
DOI 10.1080/02687038.2023.2262693
Authors

Sarah J. Wallace, Lisa Anemaat, Michelle Attard, Caroline Baker, Karianne Berg, Marcella Carragher, Jytte Isaksen, Brooke Ryan, Nina Simmons-Mackie, Edwina Wang, Linda Worrall, Kirstine Shrubsole

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 41 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 22%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 22%
Other 1 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 11%
Unknown 3 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 2 22%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 11%
Arts and Humanities 1 11%
Linguistics 1 11%
Neuroscience 1 11%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,431,741
of 25,856,138 outputs
Outputs from Aphasiology
#46
of 723 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,509
of 360,107 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Aphasiology
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,856,138 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 723 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,107 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them