You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
関節可動域制限に対する基礎研究の動向と臨床への応用
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Physical Therapy Japan, August 2018
|
| DOI | 10.15063/rigaku.45-4kikaku_honda_yuichiro |
| Authors |
本田 祐一郎, 坂本 淳哉, 中野 治郎, 沖田 実 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 5 | 25% |
| Unknown | 15 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2023.
All research outputs
#2,465,750
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Physical Therapy Japan
#18
of 297 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,949
of 343,358 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Physical Therapy Japan
#2
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 297 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,358 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.