You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Attention over time
Attention Score history
Activity
X Demographics
Mendeley demographics
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
ECAP-controlled closed-loop versus open-loop SCS for the treatment of chronic pain: 36-month results of the EVOKE blinded randomized clinical trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, August 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1136/rapm-2023-104751 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nagy A Mekhail, Robert M Levy, Timothy R Deer, Leonardo Kapural, Sean Li, Kasra Amirdelfan, Jason E Pope, Corey W Hunter, Steven M Rosen, Shrif J Costandi, Steven M Falowski, Abram H Burgher, Christopher A Gilmore, Farooq A Qureshi, Peter S Staats, James Scowcroft, Tory McJunkin, Jonathan Carlson, Christopher K Kim, Michael I Yang, Thomas Stauss, Erika A Petersen, Jonathan M Hagedorn, Richard Rauck, Jan W Kallewaard, Ganesan Baranidharan, Rod S Taylor, Lawrence Poree, Dan Brounstein, Rui V Duarte, Gerrit E Gmel, Robert Gorman, Ian Gould, Erin Hanson, Dean M Karantonis, Abeer Khurram, Angela Leitner, Dave Mugan, Milan Obradovic, Zhonghua Ouyang, John Parker, Peter Single, Nicole Soliday, the EVOKE Study Group, Dan Brounstein, Rui V Duarte, Gerrit E Gmel, Robert GormanIan Gould, Erin Hanson, Dean M Karantonis, Abeer Khurram, Angela Leitner, Dave Mugan, Milan Obradovic, Zhonghua Ouyang, John Parker, Peter Single, Nicole Soliday |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Greece | 1 | 50% |
| United States | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley demographics
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 82 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 12% |
| Unknown | 49 | 60% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Unknown | 49 | 60% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2025.
All research outputs
#1,765,960
of 31,660,612 outputs
Outputs from Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine
#185
of 3,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,462
of 369,138 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine
#6
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,660,612 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,060 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,138 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.