You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Somatic evolution of marine transmissible leukemias in the common cockle, Cerastoderma edule
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Cancer, October 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s43018-023-00641-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alicia L. Bruzos, Martín Santamarina, Daniel García-Souto, Seila Díaz, Sara Rocha, Jorge Zamora, Yunah Lee, Alejandro Viña-Feás, Michael A. Quail, Iago Otero, Ana Pequeño-Valtierra, Javier Temes, Jorge Rodriguez-Castro, Leyre Aramburu, André Vidal-Capón, Antonio Villanueva, Damián Costas, Rosana Rodríguez, Tamara Prieto, Laura Tomás, Pilar Alvariño, Juana Alonso, Asunción Cao, David Iglesias, María J. Carballal, Ana M. Amaral, Pablo Balseiro, Ricardo Calado, Bouchra El Khalfi, Urtzi Izagirre, Xavier de Montaudouin, Nicolas G. Pade, Ian Probert, Fernando Ricardo, Pamela Ruiz, Maria Skazina, Katarzyna Smolarz, Juan J. Pasantes, Antonio Villalba, Zemin Ning, Young Seok Ju, David Posada, Jonas Demeulemeester, Adrian Baez-Ortega, Jose M. C. Tubio |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 176 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 40 | 23% |
| United States | 17 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 8 | 5% |
| France | 5 | 3% |
| Italy | 3 | 2% |
| Mexico | 3 | 2% |
| Germany | 2 | 1% |
| India | 2 | 1% |
| Canada | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 18 | 10% |
| Unknown | 76 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 96 | 55% |
| Scientists | 72 | 41% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 12 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 17% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 8% |
| Researcher | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 4 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 33% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 17% |
| Philosophy | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 396. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2023.
All research outputs
#77,395
of 25,660,026 outputs
Outputs from Nature Cancer
#11
of 694 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,400
of 359,028 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Cancer
#2
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,660,026 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 694 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 62.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,028 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.