You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Gene-flow investigation between garden and wild roses planted in close distance
|
---|---|
Published in |
Plant Biotechnology, December 2023
|
DOI | 10.5511/plantbiotechnology.23.0708a |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Yuna Asagoshi, Eri Hitomi, Noriko Nakamura, Seiji Takeda |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 100% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2023.
All research outputs
#6,480,431
of 25,052,270 outputs
Outputs from Plant Biotechnology
#44
of 327 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,775
of 162,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Biotechnology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,052,270 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 327 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 162,134 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them